Plansmith Blog

Establishing and maintaining a sound interest rate risk (IRR) management program is crucial to ensure proper balance sheet structure and comply with Regulatory expectations. During my 20+ years as a senior FDIC examiner, I routinely saw organizations experiencing issues with their ALM/IRR practices, ranging from loose misunderstandings of the guidance to critical errors that put the health of the organization at risk. Unfortunately, in my current advisory role, all too often, I see the same issues.

Over the last decade and a half, there has been a sort of dance when it comes to deposit stability. Following the Economic Crisis, we saw a massive “surge” of funds into banks and credit unions as depositors sought safety and a place to “park” money until better returns were again available in the market. In early 2020, after market rates had jumped a bit, I crafted a blog declaring the death of surge deposits, but then quickly had to shift as we saw a new round of “surge deposits” following the Government’s release of trillions of dollars in Covid-related Stimulus funds. Then, as deposit rates shot up in 2023, we saw a massive movement of funds from low-cost checking and savings deposits into higher-yielding CDs and MMDAs. Now, as we near the end of 2024, we’re left with a lot of deposit-related questions. Specifically,

• Is this period of deposit migration finally over?
• How stable are our remaining deposit balances?
• Were our IRR model deposit pricing and decay assumptions right, and/or do we need to make changes in light of historical performance and/or future expectations?
• How much impact do any of these assumptions really have on our model results?

To help answer those questions (ones examiners will certainly be asking), we’d strongly suggest that you be sure that your asset liability management program includes backtesting, sensitivity testing, and decay rate and deposit trends studies.

Are you really planning, or are you just budgeting?

By this I mean, are you filling out the numbers on a spreadsheet or planning the actions needed to make it a reality?

It’s always gratifying when all the numbers come together in a neat package showing expected growth and earnings for next year. And, there were likely many contributors who verbally expressed their goals and plans on how they are going to reach them. The compiled financial targets are then presented to and accepted by the board, and your monthly comparisons begin. Budget “predictions” are compared to reality. Variances from “budget” are explained, and business continues as usual. In essence, that’s budgeting.

Our recent blog discussed Product Profitability, or the process of analyzing your product line by looking at each asset category and adjusting its yield by adding non-interest income, and subtracting applicable loan losses and overhead. The overhead we associated with the asset was its funding liability cost less applicable service charges. This gave us a more heightened awareness of the true earning potential of each earning asset.

As increased competition and consolidation challenge the financial industry, your business must continue to adapt using strategies for success, not unlike those of other businesses.

Manufacturing and retail have long used product management techniques to meet competitive pressures for pricing, product planning, and growth strategies. If financial institutions are to survive and prosper in this highly charged competitive environment, management must understand and control all components of profitability. Margin and equity risks have been addressed using regulatory rate shock methodologies, as well as recommended and required stress testing of the loan portfolio, including loan losses. Product profitability combines these concepts with an often-overlooked element of cost – overhead.

Uncertainty and volatility seem to be the only consistent elements concerning the post-COVID economy. So, how do you adequately measure the financial impact today’s economic landscape will have on your business? By utilizing a true planning model.

A professional forecasting platform for Budgeting and ALM/IRR adapts to changing conditions. As it is relationship-driven, it can be set to react to environmental changes, including rates. As the rate environment shifts, so should your balance sheet growth and product mix. Planning models help you test the impact of such changes and measure results in minutes, not hours.

For banks and credit unions, navigating the ever-evolving financial landscape requires more than just intuition and experience. It demands a clear vision, a roadmap etched with achievable goals, and a dedicated pursuit of those objectives. Goal setting emerges as the compass guiding organizations through market volatility, technological disruptions, and changing customer expectations. Effective goal setting empowers banks and credit unions to not only survive but thrive in a dynamic financial ecosystem.

In the last two years, the Fed has implemented 11 increases in the target Fed Funds rate, amounting to a total of 525 basis points. These moves were aimed at tempering the overheated economy in the wake of the COVID pandemic.
As a result of these increases, we have seen massive shifts in deposit balances as consumers have become more aware of opportunities to move balances from lower yielding non-maturity deposits into higher yielding CDs and alternative investment products. While we can’t be sure of what future market rate movements will be, or when they will occur, every financial institution must be prepared for any outcome.

Considering this era is marked by economic uncertainty and rapid shifts, understanding liquidity's critical role continues to be paramount. Here are three key reasons maintaining a strong liquidity risk management program in 2024 and beyond is not a suggestion, but a necessity for community banks and credit unions.

Risk is inevitable in banking; in fact, it’s what makes banking profitable. The question is, how much risk is acceptable? Recognizing that existing techniques of measurement were sometimes misleading and arbitrary, Plansmith developed a simple calculation called "Margin Risk Tolerance" that defines how much risk each bank can take. Despite the wealth of banking information Plansmith has at hand, we believe risk relates to the individual bank, and cannot be measured to any peer standard or magic number.

Margin risk tolerance calculates the minimum net interest income and net interest margin necessary to maintain continuing operations. Minimum margin consists of two basic components: 1) earnings needed to maintain an acceptable capital ratio and pay dividends, and 2) earnings needed for overhead.

What do massive shifts in deposits, a possible impending recession, and a tremendous hike in interest rates have in common? Absolute potential for wreaking havoc on your institution’s liquidity position. One unplanned or mismanaged situation could mean falling out of policy limits, or worse.

Before we dig into what the present state of the economy could mean for your organization’s liquidity position, let’s make sure we’re on the same page with what we’re discussing. Per the OCC, “Liquidity is the risk to a bank's earnings and capital arising from its inability to timely meet obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses. Bank management must ensure that sufficient funds are available at a reasonable cost to meet potential demands from both funds providers and borrowers.”